BJP leader Subramanian Swamy had accused Sonia, Rahul Gandhi and others of conspiring to cheat and misappropriate funds by just paying Rs50 lakh by which YI obtained the right to recover Rs90.25 crore which the AJL had owed to the Congress party. Photo: Hindustan Times
Swamy had accused Sonia, Rahul Gandhi and others of conspiring to cheat and misappropriate funds by just paying Rs50 lakh by which YI obtained the right to recover Rs90.25 crore which the AJL had owed to the Congress party.
“Complainant has established a prima facie case against the accused under section 403 (dishonest misappropriation of property, 406 (criminal breach of trust) and 420 (cheating) read with section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of IPC.
Also Read
“Dr Swamy is known for his personal, motivated campaign against the Congress and you can take it that as and when we receive the papers and take the full legal advice a very vigorous response will be filed in respect of this completely false and motivated complaint.
“Issuance of process over a stale complaint made a year ago is not something to be excited about. Let’s seek comprehensive legal advice and you will see how all allegations are legally demolished,” Singhvi said.
The court, in its order, said, “from the complaint and the evidence led so far, it appears that YI was in fact created as a sham or a cloak to convert public money to personal use or as a special purpose vehicle for acquiring control over Rs 2000 crores worth of assets of The Associated Journals Ltd.(AJL).
“Since all the accused persons have allegedly acted in consortium with each other to achieve the said nefarious design, there are sufficient grounds for proceeding against all of them,” the court said.
It said the accused Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Moti Lal Vohra, Oscar Fernandes were the office bearers and trustees of the funds of the Congress party and the funds of the party were not the personal property of the accused.
“The funds entrusted to them by the party were to be utilised to advance the purposes for which the Congress party was formed....
“These funds could not have been advanced in the form of an interest-free loan to AJL, as no provisions exists in the Representation of the People Acts or the constitution of the party permitting grant of any such loan to a company engaged in commercial activities,” the court said.
“The accused, prima facie appears to have committed criminal breach of trust on the existing share holders of AJL as well as against the company,” it added.
No comments:
Post a Comment