Lenders have also asked the company to reduce debt and bring in more equity. The company was also asked to monetize its non-core assets as part of the deleveraging exercise.
The first audit will find out whether the company hid something or has indulged in any malpractice, while the second will simply keep track of its cash.
Mint couldn’t immediately ascertain whether Bhushan Steel has agreed to induct three nominees of the banks into its board.
The move is a radical one for Indian banks that aren’t usually as aggressive, but it indicates a desire on their part to get tough on bad loans (or loans that run the risk of turning bad) in the banking system.
It also comes amid recent moves by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) which has been investigating the issue of bad loans on the books of banks.
A consortium of 51 lenders has an exposure of around Rs.40,000 crore to Bhushan Steel and met on Monday to decide on ways to protect their exposure.
The lenders have asked the company to reduce debt and bring in more equity. The company was also asked to monetize its non-core assets within a definite time frame as part of the deleveraging exercise.
The bankers will also appoint an independent engineer to monitor the operations of the company and the projects, said a statement issued by Punjab National Bank, the lead lender.
Bhushan Steel, the sixth-largest Indian steel maker by capacity, produces about 2.2 million tonnes (mt) of mostly flat steel products at plants in Uttar Pradesh, Odisha and Maharashtra. Bhushan Steel has a net debt of Rs.31,754.09 crore as of 31 March, 12% higher than the Rs.28,356.23 crore debt it had a year earlier. The company’s debt-to-equity ratio, one of the highest in the industry, stood at 3.46 as on 31 March.
In the meeting, banks took stock of the performance of Bhushan Steel—production volume, turnover and the management. The company is said to have assured bankers that it is financially stable and there is no cause for worry.
Bhushan Steel has asked for more time to cut its debt and bring in equity. Meanwhile, the company has agreed to monetise its non-core assets, the statement said.
Analysts said that Bhushan Steel Ltd’s troubles can be traced to an ambitious capacity expansion in Odisha for a 5 million tonne (mt) integrated steel plant in 2007.
In November, there was an explosion near a blast furnace after which its phase III expansion operations of the Odisha plant were stopped on the direction of State Pollution Control Board, according to a Care Ratings report in March.
The production loss impacted sales and by the time the Pollution Control Board gave its consent in January to restart operations, the delay hit profitability and cash flows, the report added.
“There have been reported cost overruns on phase III project with the company spending Rs.7,515 crore (including exchange fluctuation of Rs.777 crore) on the project up to 31 December as against the estimated project cost of Rs.6,583 crore,” Care said.
Ananda Bhoumik, senior director at India Ratings, said there is a sense of urgency in Bhushan Steel’s case given the large exposure of the banking system to the company.
“If the banks actually manage to get the board seats, which is traditionally reserved for shareholders, it can be considered a good progress for creditor rights,” he said.
As of 31 March, the 40 listed banks had gross NPAs of Rs.2.42 trillion, up from Rs.1.8 trillion a year ago.
remya.n@livemint.com
No comments:
Post a Comment