A file photo of B. Ramalinga Raju (centre). Photo: Mint
Raju confessed to fudging the accounts of Satyam to the tune of Rs.7,136 crore in January 2009, setting off a flight of employees and a wave of client defections. He later disowned his statement during the trial.
SFIO filed a total of seven cases for violations in auditing process and Companies Act. The court acquitted the accused in one case relating to the payment of dividends. SFIO has accused Raju and others of not providing a break-up of audit expenses, not providing information on payment of professional charges, not providing employment particulars of those who were paid over Rs.24 lakh annually, non-disclosure of dividend remittances, adjustment of entries in the balance sheet, and not attaching enclosures to the balance sheet.
Lawyer Ramakrishna Raju added the defence is planning to file an application before the court to exempt Raju, Rama Raju and V. Srinivas from going to jail because they appeared in the court while in the remand of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). All three are currently out on bail.
Other than the economic offences court case, there are at least three other cases pending against Raju.
A special court conducting the trial of a complaint filed by CBI is set to deliver its judgement on 23 December.
Apart from CBI and SFIO, Raju is also being tried in separate cases filed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and Enforcement Directorate (ED). The Sebi case is being heard in the economic offences court while the special court is conducting the trial of the ED case. In a pre-emptive move, Rama Raju had approached the Andhra Pradesh high court on 19 November, arguing that the economic offences court has no jurisdiction to try cases related to Satyam scam. Raju’s actions posed serious questions on the credibility of India’s outsourcing industry, prompting the government to replace Satyam’s board with its own.
No comments:
Post a Comment